Carefully Constructed Criticism

Being an indie author/filmmaker, I “follow” a network of other indie authors. Following for me involves not only reading and/or viewing their works, but also supporting them in whatever way is needed. (Even if it’s to bitch and vent about the benefits of being called an indie vs. a self-published author). Yes, we “indies” are a tight-knit, vociferous group. We have found it almost impossible to enter the “mainstream” world of publishing, so we simply created a publishing world of our own. This doesn’t negate the fact that we all hope in our heart of hearts to become, if not famous, well-known enough (whatever ENOUGH is for any given indie). This will let us know that our works are being shared and discussed by more than ourselves; that the possibility exists for us to create, maintain and grow a following of fans; that perhaps (fingers crossed) one day we might even (hope against hope) be able to eke out a decent living. That is why when people outside or our “network” review our works, we try to make sure and review, well, the review-er.

Recently, a couple of fellow indie authors received a negative review by someone who purports herself to be a professionally “honest and fair” reviewer. This person not only critiques books, but also is a panelist for a well-known independent literary award. To me, this is a conflict of interests mostly because you’re not really critiquing, you’re judging. This reviewer (who shall remain nameless), cannot in her own words “separate the author from the fiction he/she is writing”; so, how can she be trusted to remember to take of her judge “hat” and put on her “critic” hat?

One of the authors’ whose work she reviewed wrote about “praying the gay away” in his FICTIONAL book. (I made that all caps for the reviewer, (not that she’ll read this, but you never know) it seems that fiction is akin to real life for her.) *RME* (That’s Rolling My Eyes for my non-Twitter/FB/texting shorthand followers). Anyway, instead of simply critiquing the content of the book, she attacked the author for making her feel uncomfortable because his character was guilty of undertaking this reprehensible practice. Yet another author AND his work was decimated by this reviewer for creating a misogynistic character who does alot of soul-searching and wants to become a better person and fails. (Art mirroring reality? Apparently not for her. Apparently all the people SHE knows are perfect and accomplish their goals with no problem…).

Now I may be in the minority by thinking this way (which is fine because I’m used to being in a minority), but isn’t art supposed to be provocative (even if the provocation is negative)? Isn’t art supposed to take you out of your comfort zone and make you think differently (even if by thinking differently we want to vomit); or see things differently? Isn’t art supposed to mirror the authors’ worlds and the times in which they live? When I took English Lit in college, my professor gave a Reader’s Digest-condensed version of the world/times of any given English author we were to read and discuss/critique in order to give us a broader understanding from what “place” the author was writing.

Now I’m no fan of most film critics, mostly because they use the vindictiveness born from not being able to “make it” in the entertainment world, to destroy careers. I mean think about it. If those who prevented his acceptance into art school, knew about the potential for Adolf Hitler to go off the deep end if he couldn’t realize his artistic dreams, simply let him try; imagine all the heartache that would have been stopped before it had a chance to begin? But I digress… As I was saying, I’m no fan of most film critics because they either don’t realize or don’t care about the power they wield with their negative reviews. The book “critic” I have ranted about above, had many comments from her followers thanking her profusely for stopping them from buying and reading a book they were mulling over; thereby preventing them from making up their own minds AND stopping an author’s work from being purchased and discussed. (I blame the followers as well because, I mean GEEZ! Don’t you all have frakkin’ minds of your own?! Are you all sheep, or what?! … WOO SAA!)

Some film critics, however, like Leonard Maltin and Roger Ebert have said/written in their critiques that what they are saying is in fact their own opinions AND they encourage people to make up their own minds. These critics (and others) do know how to separate the filmmaker from the film. I mean, I’ve never heard or read Roger Ebert referring to Michael Bay as an unfeeling robot simply because he directed “Transformers” or Tim Burton as a dark and disturbing person simply because his movies have that tendency. Carefully constructed criticism though difficult, isn’t impossible and it should be attempted with at least as much vigor as one would attempt to, say, save one’s child from certain death; because that is what art is to an artist… Their child… Their creation… something through which their immortality may be realized, whether the creation be “good” or “bad”… in any reviewer’s OPINION.

Jus’ sayin’…


About adauphin04

Humanist, feminist, writer, filmmaker. Ford is an alumni of Bloomfield College, where she majored in Media Studies/Communications and minored in English Literature. While attending Bloomfield College, as a single parent she worked full-time, was on the High Honors list, and a member of the National Honors Society. As a graduate, Ford was listed in the Who’s Who of College Students in America. She has been working at Westminster Arts Center for eight years, is an avid reader and film-goer, writes novels, graphic novels, screenplays and poetry. She is currently working on a feminist docu-drama entitled, "You're Not the Boss of Me!" She is also currently in pre-production with her first feature film "Being Free". Ford lives with her son, Jason, and their pets: Boo (a cat) and Akasha (a ball python). Ford and family are beginning a new chapter in their lives and relocating to Colorado in October 2016.
This entry was posted in book critic, criticism, critique, film critic, judging, Uncategorized, writing and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Carefully Constructed Criticism

  1. jballam says:

    Beautifully said!


  2. Joe Pineda says:

    By that same token, a critic can’t be compromising his/her review to keep from hurting feelings. Then their feedback will not be as authentic and honest. Just as you can’t be an artist and have a silly tendency to take everything as negative criticism, you can’t be a critic and worry about how your words will be interpreted. Sadly, this is about growing a thicker skin and rolling with the punches.


  3. rlboyington says:

    I’ve read only a few of your posts to date but intend to read them on a regular basis. They very much deserve a broad readership!
    And… thank you for your several “like”s at my relatively new blog. I am slowly discovering that writing, say nothing of blogging (about) some of that writing, is a lot of work.
    Thank you for your posts, Traci.


    • adauphin04 says:

      Thanks so much for the kind words, Ray (or do you prefer Raymond?)! I’m slowly trying to gain a following but with so much competition it’s difficult. I am grateful to everyone for the RTs on Twitter as that goes a long way towards spreading my words. I hope you keep at it as I like your “voice” and look forward to reading more! I liked the excerpts from Peter’s work that I’ve read so far. He had a great “voice”, as well!

      Thanks again!


      • rlboyington says:

        Ray is fine. Thank you for your encouraging comments. I’ll be back and may even say a few more things too.
        If it didn’t look like a full time occupation (based on my observing Jack Urquhart, especially doing fast Fridays) I might join Twitter too. But i’m not ready yet for that much more commitment beyond my editing and publishing and blogging and cooking and…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s